I started writing this post in mid-March, right around the time my company announced we’d be working from home indefinitely due to COVID-19. That’s when things seemed really dire and writing a silly blog post like this felt facetious. And also the post felt a little negative at a time when we needed positivity. But I decided to drag it out from my drafts, shine it up, and publish it today because maybe what we need right now is something completely ridiculous and inconsequential. So let’s discuss some of my strongest (and maybe controversial) bookish opinions.
I hate mass-market paperbacks.
Everyone’s seen a mass-market paperback, right? They’re those smaller paperbacks, the ones common in the romance genre. (Think: the books with Fabio on the cover in the grocery store.) Anyway, I hate them. They are just not user-friendly! Unless I break the spine, I find that they are kinda awkward to hold when reading, and let’s not even talk about the font size. Ugh. Say no to mass-market paperbacks! This is why I read the majority of my romance novels on Kindle because most romances are produced as mass-market paperbacks. (Although I’ve been thrilled to discover more romances being published in a traditional paperback format. More of this, please!)
If I never have to hear another person call a romance “predictable,” it will be too soon.
This might be my biggest bookish pet peeve. A romance novel is predictable by its very nature. It’s like calling a mystery novel predictable because the murderer is revealed at the end. Well, duh. That’s how it works! A romance novel is supposed to be predictable. It is supposed to be formulaic. It is supposed to have a meet-cute, an evolving relationship, a dark moment, and a happily ever after. End of story. (A novel without a HEA is not a romance novel, just FYI.)
You shouldn’t rate books you’ve abandoned.
I see this all the time on Goodreads—people who have read maybe 50-100 pages of a book and decide to abandon it, but then they go ahead and rate the book. Nope. I am firmly against rating books you haven’t finished. If I decide not to finish a book, I give up my right to rate it. There’s no way of knowing what my true rating would be of the whole book, so giving it a rating when I’ve only read about 10-20% just isn’t fair.
The book isn’t always better than the movie.
Crazy Rich Asians and To All the Boys I’ve Loved Before, boom. I did not enjoy either of these books, but fell completely head over heels for the movies. I just don’t agree that the book is always better. It’s not. Some books just translate better to the screen.
Listening to an audiobook is the same as reading a book.
I can’t believe I am still having this argument with friends, and yet here I am. I still have friends who will not count an audiobook toward their yearly book total, and it makes zero sense to me. Plenty of studies have shown that your brain takes in an audiobook the same way it does a physical book. I listen to a lot of my book club books on audio and can have the same conversations about plot and characters and themes with my friends who chose to read the physical book. I’ve also heard the argument that audiobooks don’t count since you are often multitasking while listening, but y’all, you know our brains can do multiple things at once, right? Plus, the majority of the ways we multitask while listening aren’t things that involve much concentration: going for a walk, folding laundry, washing dishes, driving, etc. Audiobooks count.
Okay – your turn! Do you have any controversial bookish opinions? Or do you disagree with any of mine? Let’s discuss!